PSAC Pay Equity Bulletin
No. 50
February 4, 2002
The scoop on rumours about more pay equity
cheques
There are some final pay equity cheques which are still outstanding which
the PSAC understands will be issued later this year. For most members, the
amount will be quite small - less than $10 in some cases, probably no more than
$50 to $150 on average. A very few members may receive as much as $500 or
more. These cheques represent the interest owed between April 1, 2000 and the
date that the pay equity cheques (NOT the interest cheques) were actually
printed. In many cases, this involved a period of only a week or so; hence the
small amounts.
Don’t spend your tax money just yet
Thousands of members have filed Notices of Objection to the taxation of their
interest payments. The PSAC has selected a test case which is being pursued in
the Tax Court of Canada. As with many court proceedings, this is a lengthy
process with many legal steps. It is unlikely the actual hearing in the Tax
Court will take place until much later this year, at the earliest. The union
will provide updates on the case as it proceeds. (More information on this issue
can be found in pay equity bulletins #44 and #49).
The union strongly recommends that current and former members file a Notice
of Objection, if they have not already done so, in order to be certain that
their cases will be covered by the test case.
Section 99 reference goes to Court
Back in March 2001, the PSAC had filed a Section 99 reference with the Public
Service Staff Relations Board (PSSRB) asking the Board to declare that the pay
equity adjustments were pay for all purposes for the entire retroactive period
(i.e. back to March 8, 1985) and should be recalculated accordingly,
except for a small number of situations covered in two specific sections
of the pay equity agreement for which the payment of average entitlements
was agreed upon, in the interest of getting cheques to members within a
reasonable time frame. (Details on the S. 99 reference can be found in an
earlier pay equity bulletin, #46.)
The case was heard in June, 2001. The PSSRB subsequently side-stepped the
issue. The Board’s decision said that unless the parties could agree on the
issues in dispute, they should go back to the Federal Court or to the Human
Rights Tribunal.
The PSAC reviewed the PSSRB decision and has decided to appeal it to the
Federal Court of Appeal. No date for the hearing has yet been set.
|